Talk:Vaghela dynasty

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

India: Gujarat / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result is Merge.

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose to merge Vaghela into Vaghela dynasty as they seem to be of the same subject. In fact, they were both copy pasted by User:Sachaai in 13 July 2009. --Muhandes (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vaghela are sub caste of Nai?[edit]

If Vaghela are not sub caste or surname of Nai caste so why Nai caste article state that vaghela is division of nai caste? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talk • contribs) 01:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute[edit]

Please see WP:SYNTH first user:Chariotrider555 you took the source where they are described as rajputs later you used the source of Cynthia where she mentions rajput Identity didn't exist in 12th cent it didn't mentions vaghela trying to connect them is purely WP:UNDUE WP:OR and violation of WP:SYNTH 42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If neither Jackson nor Talbot mentions that Vaghelas specifically as Rajputs in later times, then there is no reason for the entire statement to even be there. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine.42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]