Talk:VALS

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes[edit]

Hmm. The mention of LOV, RVS, and Schwartz, making the unsubstantiated claim that LOV produced better results than VALS, struck me as out of place here. Also, the documentary reference at the end is not appropriate either. If it's included, we might as well list every documentary ever made about society. 65.248.252.99 (talk) 17:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The connection with Reconstructive Observations is very weak and unestablished. 65.248.252.99 (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just made some very small fixes to this article, but it still needs help (and additional citations). It's not very well-written right now, it does indeed need attention from an expert, and I think there are several competing/contradictory VALS frameworks currently described in the article, which is confusing. Sue Gardner (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]