Talk:Ursulines of Quebec

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ursulines of Quebec article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Quebec Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copying[edit]

Is it okay to copy articles word-for-word from other sites?

This article copied WORD-FOR-WORD from: The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XV. Published 1912. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Nihil Obstat, October 1, 1912. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York and/or CatholiCity.com © 1996-2007 The Mary Foundation

Makes it easy to create articles fast and boost ones edit count. IP4240207xx 00:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. No, we aren't meant to copy verbatim from other sites. Quotations from others must be indicated as such and the source cited. I just stumbled upon this article and created a link to it from Quebec City but now I better solve the problem of this page's plagiarism. I've never been to this museum but the location has travel website pointers recommending it, and being the "oldest educational institution for women in North America" makes it notable.

Sigh, I suppose I'll need to rewrite all this in original language now. Birdbrainscan 02:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A publication date of 1912 means that the text is out-of-copyright; as long as the source is given, there is no problem. There are a lot of articles from the Catholic Ancyclopedia in Wikipedia. It has to be wikified and updated, of course. Eugène van der Pijll 11:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up tag[edit]

This article could be much improved by shortening/tightening and judicious blue links. If someone wanted this type of detail, they would probably go to the originating source. (As always; my opinion) --Stormbay 21:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]