Talk:United Kingdom Accreditation Service

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why should I pay extra for an accredited calibration?[edit]

Agilent are arguably the worlds leading manufacturer of vector network analyzers (VNA). Although Anrisu and Rohde and Schwarz might argue they are, even they would have to accept Agilent make very good vector network analyzers. Agilent have a basic calibration cost on my VNA, but if I want it UKAS accredited calibration I need to pay more. Agilent's reason for charging more is they have the costs in keeping the UKAS accreditation, which they pass on to customers that want it. I'm just wondering why anyone would want a body like UKAS accrediting arguably the worlds leading manufacturer. It's a bit like a body saying that Heinz know how to make baked beans! Needless to say, I did not pay extra for the accreditation, when I gather the VNA will be tested in the same lab, by the same person, using the same automated test equipment, irrespective of whether one pays for the accredited calibration or not. One just gets another logo or two on the calibration certificate. Drkirkby (talk) 22:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responding[edit]

Others can respond better than I, however it should be noted that although UKAS would look at processes that may be applied to unaccredited work, they would not necessarily look at the unaccredited work itself, so excluding it from the pool of assured work. ==

BEIS[edit]

Department of Business Energy Innovation and Skills (BEIS) is no more. I don't know which government department inherited their role as a UKAS member, but would be good if someone can update this.