Talk:USS Catawba (1864)

USS Catawba (1864) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 5, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Chincha Islands War[edit]

Along the way a ref had been added stating that the Catawba had been purchased by Peru for the Chincha Islands War. It seems that ref either must be wrong or have been cited poorly. The Chincha Islands War was from 1864 to 1866. The Catawba wasn't on the market until 1868. I removed the sentence for now. If the original article statement was somehow accurate please clarify it and feel free to put it back in. Zurel Darrillian (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Catawba (1864)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 15:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will aim to get to this on the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ping!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tks, clean forgot I had this one, was obviously confusing it with another ship article I had down for review that I just completed... ;-) Should get to it later today... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No rush.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox check -- no dab or external link issues.

Prose -- completed my usual copyedit, let me know if any probs.

Structure/coverage/referencing -- all seem fine.

Supporting materials -- image apparently wants a US public domain tag; I shouldn't think there's an issue with it, however, so I just see this as a matter of tidying rather than anything to delay passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]