Talk:Typhoon Noru

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page name[edit]

I wish to suggest that this page be moved to Typhoon Noru (2022), as it may not become the most prominent typhoon of this name, see Typhoon Noru (2017). An admin would need to delete the existing redirect Typhoon Noru (2022) to make way for this move. Drdpw (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd give this some time to wait and see. I do agree the page was made under the wrong title, but it is well on its way to gain PRIMARYTOPIC considering how the Philippines massively underestimated the forecast strength of the storm due to its unprecedented intensification, which may have disastrous consequences. Chlod (say hi!) 01:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 September 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Typhoon NoruTyphoon Noru (2022) – To not be confused with Typhoon Noru (2017) SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. The page has the {{about}} template at the top to clear any confusion. As for the whole "retirement before WP:PRIMARYTOPIC" thing, Noru is well on its way to being retired, and clears the "damages" bar set by the PAGASA (minimum of ₱1 billion). It's expected that they'll send in a request for retirement to the Typhoon Committee eventually. We're not an RSMC, we're Wikipedia, and WP:COMMONNAME takes priority over added bureaucracy from weak local consensus. Might also be worth mentioning that Noru 2017 primarily hit Japan, which doesn't actually use names given by the JMA (and instead uses a number identifier, in this case: 平成29年台風第5号). Chlod (say hi!) 01:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose. This is clearly a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC This is the topic to which the term should lead, serving as the title of (or a redirect to) the relevant article. (e.g Hurricane Ida Hurricane Ida (2009)). HurricaneEdgar 05:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose. Noru's 2022 incarnation has already supplanted its 2017 iteration in terms of notability and notoriety. This is definitely a case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC now for its impacts in the Philippines and Vietnam. Vida0007 (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I agree with 2022's Noru being a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC due to the deaths and damage it caused. Despite, 2017's Noru was known for being the second-longest-lasting tropical cyclone in the northwest Pacific Ocean, 2022's Noru should be the lead article as it was the most notorious storm of the three other storms. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 05:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Current events, WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, WikiProject Weather, and WikiProject Vietnam have been notified of this discussion. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 07:43, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose 2017's Noru only lived very long whilst this year's Noru was a category 5 typhoon that killed 22 people and is the primary topic. RandomInfinity17 (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Undefined ref[edit]

@Bsslover371: please fill in a source for the ":Cambodia" ref you added last year. -- Fyrael (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]