Talk:Tryphon, Respicius, and Nympha

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Merging "Saint Trifon" and "Tryphon Zarezan" with this article.[edit]

Great idea; they all deal with the same person. In addition, why not remove Respicius and Nympha from the title, especially since Nympha seems to have no connection to Tryphon other than shared relics and a former common saint's day? St. Julian of Toledo and St. John of God both have the same saint's day, but no one would suggest a joint article for them.--Isidorpax (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the Tryphon Zarezan article, which seems to be the same Trifon/Tryphon. 192.55.208.10 (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I merged both those pages into this one. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. There is no support other than the nom for the proposed move. Splitting Saint Tryphon into a separate article doesn't have consensus either. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– This article is currently about three saints that have no connection to each other except for having the same feast day (formerly). The section about Respicius and Nympha is totally unsourced. I propose this article to be solely about St. Tryphon and Respicius and Nympha be removed from the article. If someone has somesources about Respicius and Nympha, we may create new article (or two) about them. --Relisted. Number 5 7 13:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Vanjagenije (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as proposed Instead split off Saint Tryphon into a separate article. A small summary can be left here. This article would then be converted into an article on the formerly joint feast day. The history of this article is the history of joint coverage, and not specifically Tryphon, and the remaining redirect does not make sense redirecting to a Tryphon-only article. Therefore, this article should be rewritten to cover the period when the feast days were the same, with short summaries on each Saint, redlinking the saints missing articles. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Respicius is said to have been a companion of Tryphon, so there's a connection there. Nympha is entombed with them. There are lots of references for Respicius and Nympha; I added one. Peter Flass (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Having a common feast day may be a slightly weak reason for combining people, but it's not completely invalid, it's not as if the article is too long. PatGallacher (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.