Talk:Torture in fiction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • ... that inaccurate depictions of torture in fiction have been cited to justify torture and are imitated by real-life torturers? Source: various, see article

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 09:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Another heavy nomination, but its long enough, cited to multiple reliable sources, and seems fairly neutral. It's not exhaustive but it doesn't need to be to cover the topic well. There's room for expansion but it's fine as is right now. The hooks are all cited to solid sources, and interesting (I feel weird describing them that way though). No copyvio detected, and qpq is done. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I'm not sure this belongs on the main page in this state, as every reader will quickly think up contrary examples that this article does not present. For instance, the implication that the Star Trek franchise promotes torture as a useful device is just plain wrong; in particular, try watching the 1992 Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "Chain of Command", in which Captain Picard is tortured at great length for what turns out to be no useful reason and eventually tells his antagonist, "Torture has never been a reliable means of extracting information. It is ultimately self-defeating as a means of control. One wonders it is still practiced."[1] There are plenty of movies where torture is shown to be futile and degrading to those doing it, for example the prominent 1998 film The Siege. There are plenty of TV procedurals where law enforcement people are tempted to beat an answer out of a suspect but don't, and instead figure out how to get the information they need without it. And the article's idea that TV shows are helping to provide techniques and justifications for torturers is, unfortunately, not in alignment with any reading of history. People have figured out how to conduct torture, and to justify it to themselves, before TV, before radio, before novels, before the printing press, and, as archeological findings sometimes show, before writing itself. Most of this article is sourced to two authors; I would suspect there are some more balanced or nuanced views out there on this subject. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Wasted Time R, I'm not sure where you got the idea that the article says Star Trek in general promotes torture? The only Star Trek show mentioned is Star Trek: Enterprise where the protagonists indeed used torture. I agree the article could use expansion, but I think it meets DYK requirements. (t · c) buidhe 01:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I also don't think the article is saying that media causes torture, just that (positive? effective?) portrayals of it in media can impact people's perceptions of it. It's kinda like how people might have drank milk forever, but media can influence whether people drink more or less milk. BuySomeApples (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting ALT1, the concise hook, to Prep 6. I read through the article; there is scope for expansion but this meets the DYK criteria. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

References

  1. ^ Lapidos, Juliet (May 7, 2009). "There Are Four Lights!". Slate.

Misreading of name[edit]

I first read the title as "Culture in popular torture".

Now that would be a really interesting article to read, if it were possible. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Popular culture is commonly used as a form of torture. For example, see Musicians tell US to ban using songs as torture. So, the article we need is popular culture in torture, eh? See also Vogon poetry... Andrew🐉(talk) 08:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Only in fiction"?[edit]

The appearance at DYK provoked some discussion at WP:ERRORS. It was not resolved but has scrolled off there now so, for the record, here's the issues.. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that efficient and professional torture is found only in fiction? two hooks about torture (this one and torture) ran relatively close together. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • From what I understand, this isn't an error if it's not in the same set. This applies to any topic such as the common radio stations, German musicians, etc. SL93 (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull The current hook is as false as a forced confession.
The article in question is torture in popular culture. Studies of fictional torture are obviously of little use in telling us what happens in the real world. And the article doesn't actually make this absolute and extreme claim – it uses the word "often" rather than "only".
If you read our article on interrogational torture, it tells quite a different story. Firstly, note that it distinguishes torture used to extract information from other cases where torture is used for other reasons such as punishment, deterrent or sadism. The fictional article fails to make this point even though there are plenty of examples in fiction. And then our article about the real thing has a section about effectiveness which provides examples showing that "research on the history of torture suggests that torture has, at times, proven quite effective". As for professionalism, the book Torture and the Military Profession indicates that real torturers often adopt professional attitudes as a form of self-justification and self-righteousness.
So, as this is an IPC article, it should stick to fiction rather than making unlikely claims about what actually happened throughout history.
Andrew🐉(talk) 08:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging nominator Buidhe, reviewer BuySomeApples, and promoter Kavyansh.Singh. SL93 (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Darius Rejali is one of the top scholars of torture in the real world, who has also written about fictional torture. It's true that torturers often pretend to adopt "professional" or "scientific" attitudes, but most sources agree that this does not reflect the reality, in which torture is a pseudoscience that leads to erosion of professional skills (see the last paragraph of Torture#Effects). If you read the article, interrogation is not the main reason for torture anyway and claims about effectiveness compared to other means of obtaining information are impossible to test and highly disputed. (t · c) buidhe 08:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If such claims are "impossible to test" and "highly disputed" then we should not be making absolute and sweeping statements about them. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All sources agree that in real life, torture is never effective in the same way as depicted in popular culture and the drawbacks are rarely portrayed. As the popular culture article states, "Torture can be a convenient plot device to extract information, and when the hero is the torturer, it almost always works, usually quickly." In real life, torture is certainly not convenient in obtaining accurate information, often takes a long time to work if at all, and does not produce accurate information in most cases (if that's even the goal). (t · c) buidhe 09:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These are massive generalisations which reek of WP:RGW. Are these sweeping statements true throughout all of history? Consider the Gunpowder Plot, for example, which is a featured article. Torture was used against the conspirators and this seems to have been both effective and professional. There are countless examples throughout history and it seems to absurd to claim that they have never, ever been effective. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The words "effective" and "professional" do not appear in the article. I think we should go with what the RS says rather than rely on original research. (t · c) buidhe 10:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The words "found only in fiction" do not appear in the article in question and so the hook is not supported. It's a basic breach of DYK rules which require "The hook should include a definite fact that is mentioned in the article ". Andrew🐉(talk) 10:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Torture_in_fiction&oldid=1209573888"