Talk:Tomo Miličević/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk · contribs) 15:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Review

Hi, I'm starting this review. It may take some time but it should be done by the end of the day! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

This article is fairly close to passing GA criteria, but there are a few issues with the sources.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "the album received multiple certifications all over the world" -sounds weird to me. I think "certifications" should be "awards," but I'm not sure if "certifications" is a more specific term for rock music.

   It refers to music recording sales certification.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• I'd like to see the references consistently formatted, but it's not required.

• The two sections are formatted according to WP:SRF, organized into online and print sources.

• The melodic.net source is cited that their second album is called "A Beautiful Lie." The source only mentions their album "The Battle of One." The allmusic.com source does mentioned that "A Beautiful Lie" is their second album, so you could replace the citation with that source.

• The Battle of One was the working title of the album. That source indicates the period the band returned to the studio.

• The allmusic.com source doesn't mention them performing at the Rock em Ring music festival.

• Fixed.

• The sxsw source does mentioned that Milicevic was a "guest musician" with Ivy Levan, but not that he "wrote and produced a number of tracks."

• Fixed.

• The Chicago Music Guide source is broken now--maybe there's an archived copy?

• Added an archived copy.

• The mTV source doesn't mentioned that Milicevic experimented with the different styles and instruments. This information is in the lead as well.

• Sourced.

• The source for Milicevic's wedding doesn't mention the date.

• His imdb profile mentions that, but I could not find a reliable source.

• The source for Milicevic's being a vegan has an incorrect URL.

• Fixed.

I didn't check the print sources, but if you'd like me to, I have access to at least one of them here in the BYU library.

You can do it if you want to.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for 7 days.

Please ping me when/if you edit the article to address those issues! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Rachel Helps (BYU), please look at my responses to your points and let me know if you have any further concerns. Miličević's brother, Filip, recently died, should we mention this in the article? The only reliable source I found is a Tomo's post on facebook.--Earthh (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining the shortened footnotes to me. I changed the sentence about their wedding to not include the date, since I couldn't find a source for it either. I think it passes GA criteria now. I'm not sure if citing Facebook for Filip's death is in line with WP:SOCIALMEDIA--I think that since it involves a third party (Filip), the information requires a news source.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your review.--Earthh (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)