Talk:Tirailleurs du Po

Tirailleurs du Po has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 2, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tirailleurs du Po/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a go. ♦ jaguar 15:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is a bit on the short side and doesn't summarise the article fully per WP:LEAD. A slight expansion would benefit it
"was a 'specialist light infantry corps'" - why is this in quotes?
"The battalion itself was composed of 8 x chasseur companies and 1 of carabiniers" - what does the 'x' mean? And write the small numbers out in prose
"Napoleon once again reviewed the battalion and apparently couldn't hide his amazement" - informal
"was known to be a good officer, nice, and event spoke Italian to comfort his men" - typo, informal again, this reads like a copy and paste
" getting in each other's way during the early stages–admittedly the fog did nothing to help–" - could be structured better as getting in each other's way during the early stages due to the fog
"the battalion had 2 officers wounded" - two
" hostilities once again broke out in Germany" - this links to the modern Germany. Is this perhaps referring to Prussia?
" and lost 1 officer killed, 1 mortally wounded, and 8 wounded" - it's good practice to write out numbers small than 12 (or is it 10?) in prose

I found a few instances which would benefit from minor copyediting, but nothing major. Once those points are out of the way this should be good to go. ♦ jaguar 19:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changes made, if you have anymore make sure you tag me. J-Man11 (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, we're good to go here.

♦ jaguar 20:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]