Talk:Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995

Australia: New South Wales / Law / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

points are great[edit]

it would be great for examples (links to cases where the point is well illustrated) for the lists of points of the operation of the act - doesnt have to be every one, even just a few would break the potential it looks like another public servant has grabbed their act and put it here verbatim trap - the potential for footnotes/links to illustrate the functions or the issues at stake would make it unique and much more encyclopediac - there are heaps of stubs about government authorities with lists of things and not a footnote or link in site addressing any of the points JarrahTree 11:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wow well beyond the usual repository of authority rules or principles - excellent! JarrahTree 14:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your great examples. MargaretRDonald (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not very pleased with the way they have gone in - maybe a different section for actions that have had the act specifically mentioned in cases , and the plans and draft proposals in a another - and actually addressing what they involved rather than being tacked on... but thats just being picky with my own edit - and not asking anyone else necessarily to do the thing.. JarrahTree 15:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

careful reading /or knowledge of the context of the range of items in https://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=NSW+Threatened+Species+Conservation+Act+1995+%28TSC+Act%29 - suggests something close to a novella - there are elements of the responses to the act and its ramifications JarrahTree 15:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]