Talk:There's Something About Marrying

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThere's Something About Marrying has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2011Good article nomineeListed

1st goof[edit]

Is this really a goof: "Although Homer stopped being homophobic in Homer's Phobia and even lived together with two openly homosexual men in Three Gays of the Condo he still can be seen holding a sign "Death before gay marriage"." I think it's just a sight-gag and a play on Homer's stupidity, rather than a goof. Lugnuts 11:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree... B. Meijlink 14:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree; that's not a mistake.--- I moved it to trivia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Svetovid (talk • contribs) 12:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Website[edit]

Does anyone know anything about the web site that was created for this episode, springfieldisforgayloversofmarriage.com ? It was around for a while but it's not working for me at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.171.50 (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:There's Something About Marrying/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 21:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review soon. Ruby2010 comment! 21:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

  • The lead's plot is a little long and detailed for a section meant to summarize, but otherwise seems fine to me
    • I have to disagree, I think it's the prefect length considering that the rest of the article is pretty long. Theleftorium (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indicate Burns was a co-executive producer
    • I don't see why that's important. There's a lot of them on the show. And no other Simpsons articles list co-executive producers. Theleftorium (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes many of them do. Just look at the articles by Queenieacoustic. I find that indicating how a writer/director relates to the show adds a lot to the article, rather than saying just mentioning a potentially obscure name. Ruby2010 comment! 23:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any DVD special features?
  • If this article were to progress to FA (it certainly is close to reaching the criteria), I'd wait for the special features to be released. Ruby2010 comment! 23:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "According to the publications Zeek: A Jewish Journal of Thought and Culture and Value War: Public Opinion and the Politics of Gay Rights," Is it publication or publications?
  • A screenshot would really add to the article, assuming you could come up with a good enough rational for it
    • I can't think of any screenshot that would pass WP:NFCC#1 and #8. Theleftorium (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 4 (The Advocate) and 10 need authors and access date
    • Access date added to both (I don't know the authors since I got the information from Google Books' snippet view). Theleftorium (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Use consistent date formatting (Compare ref 2 to 7 for instance)
  • Digital Spy is not italicized

On hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Good job with a controversial subject. Ruby2010 comment! 19:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Happy to pass this one for GA. Nice work! Ruby2010 comment! 23:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :D Theleftorium (talk) 23:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on There's Something About Marrying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on There's Something About Marrying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on There's Something About Marrying. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:There%27s_Something_About_Marrying&oldid=1207783455"