	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 April 2019 by reviewer Breawycker (talk · contribs).

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Calling Eolo a "transgender" man[edit]

While it's heavily implied and everything, the word "transgender" was never used in the novel proper, and given the setting it's highly likely that no true equivalent to modern transgender identity exists in the world of the novel. Given how the rest of wikipedia handles transgender characters and transgender interpretations in media, it feels like you shouldn't call Eolo a transgender man, because that would be interpretating the character with a modernist bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChaosCuteSoft (talk • contribs) 05:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]