Talk:The Pooh Perplex
 | A fact from The Pooh Perplex appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a 1963 book offers Marxist and Freudian interpretations of Pooh?
- ALT1: ... that a 1963 book had a chilling effect on academic analysis of Winnie-the-Pooh?
- ALT2: ... that The Pooh Perplex analyzes Winnie-the-Pooh through a Marxist lens?
- ALT3: ... that a 1963 book, which offers Marxist and Freudian interpretations of Pooh, had a chilling effect on academic analysis of the bear?
- ALT3a: ... that The Pooh Perplex, which views Pooh with Marxist and Freudian interpretations, "stifle[d] almost all critical comment on Winnie-the-Pooh for almost a decade"?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/W. Sterling Cary
- Comment: tks to EEng and theleekycauldron and Ezlev for hook help
Created by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC).
Can't see any problems with this. Article is new from a redirected page, long enough, in policy, has entertaining hooks (I personally prefer the first one), and the user has already carried out their QPQ. The article contains no images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ISD (talk • contribs) 11:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Eddie891: I can't actually find where EEng got the source for "psychoanalytic" from? Also, there might be something to combining ALT1 and ALT2 there... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 08:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron yes, neither can I ... Replaced with Freudian. Check ALT3? Eddie891 Talk Work 16:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, I proposed an ALT3a—it's a little tighter, but I don't think it beats ALTs 0–2 for punchiness. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 20:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron yes, neither can I ... Replaced with Freudian. Check ALT3? Eddie891 Talk Work 16:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
