Talk:The Plague of the Zombies

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Shot back to back with A Study in Terror and The Reptile -- that information came from:

Rigby, Jonathan, English Gothic: A Century of Horror Cinema, Reynolds & Hearn 2000 ISBN 1903111013

here's the edit that introduced added it - there were originally two articles "Plague" and "The Plague". I expanded "Plague" and then merge it into "The Plague". Unfortunately, the book in question has gone back to the library so I can't now triple-check it. - Motor (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, I just checked with English Gothic, and I can see what confused you. It does refer to four back-to-back productions in 1965, but it is referring to Dracula: Prince of Darkness, filmed back-to-back with Rasputin, the Mad Monk, and The Plague of the Zombies, filmed back-to-back with The Reptile. A Study in Terror was a non-Hammer film that just happened to be shot in the same year. I admit, though, Rigby does make it a bit ambiguous, and it could sound as if he is is saying A Study in Terror was part of the four Hammer productions. - Dave Rattigan 18:09 25 April 2006 GMT

I see... well, at least it's a good example of why you should always quote your source. - Motor (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Plague of zombies poster3.jpg[edit]

Image:Plague of zombies poster3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]