Talk:The Personal History of David Copperfield

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal The Personal History of David Copperfield is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RfC notice[edit]

There is a request for comment whose outcome may affect this article: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#RfC on distributor of post-merger Fox films. Nardog (talk) 16:32, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiracial casting[edit]

Previous films of David Copperfield have been all white. But in this movie David is played by a South Asian actor, and another character by an East Asian actor.

Isn't that notable? I'd love to know more about the casting decisions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.78.225.197 (talk) 03:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds interesting. See if you can find a source that is discussing it! BOVINEBOY2008 12:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources: [1], [2], [3]. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite simply, they decided to cast without regard to race, but on the basis of talent. (It's a production style seen more and more now. After all, art is about imagination, being open to possibility, seeking new ways to express things—so why be hung up about diversity?)

However, to comment in the article on this casting transparency would, IMHO, make it an issue, where the object was for it not to be an issue. So editorially, I believe there's more value in leaving it unmentioned, giving viewers a chance to appreciate the performances and exercise their democratic sensibilities. – AndyFielding (talk) 12:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]