Talk:The New 52: Futures End

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WildStorm characters[edit]

In the article it says: "Their inclusion suggests a larger presence of WildStorm characters, who have generally been limited to solo titles since the start of The New 52." The Stormwatch title was included in the New 52 from the beginning, and it's not a solo title! -- MMuster (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally is used, so that means not all have been solo. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September event reviews[edit]

Going to add the individual reviews for the books that I can find from IGN, Newsarama and CBR here. At the end of the month, a general reception for the event should be written, and highlight stand out issues, good and bad. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hit or miss with the Newsarama reviews. Usually in an article titled "Best Shots".
Week 1
CBR
# out of 5 stars
IGN
#.# out of 10
Newsarama
# out of 10
Issue Rating
Action Comics 2 7.3 9
Aquaman 2.5 6.5
Batwing n/a 6
Detective Comics 3.5 6.9 6
Earth 2 2 6.1
Grayson 4 4.5 1
Green Arrow 8.2 8
Green Lantern 3 8.5
Swamp Thing 5 9.6 7
Trinity of Sin: The Phantom Stranger n/a
Week 2
Batgirl 2 8.5 7
Batman 3.5 7.9 9
Birds of Prey 2 7.0 7
Constantine 3.5 7.6 9
Green Lantern Corps 7.2
Infinity Man 3.5 8.2
Justice League United 7.9 7
New Suicide Squad 4.4 6
Superboy 6
Worlds' Finest 5.8 8
Week 3
CBR
# out of 5 stars
IGN
#.# out of 10
Newsarama
# out of 10
Issue Rating
Batman and Robin 8 8
Batman/Superman 8.2
Batwoman 1 5.5 2
Green Lantern New Guardians 6.9
Justice League 2.5 6.7 6
Red Hood and the Outlaws 4.8 6
Supergirl 7.2
Superman/Wonder Woman 5.7
Teen Titans 2.5 6.1
Trinity of Sin: Pandora 8.5
Wonder Woman 2.5 6.7
Week 4
Aquaman and the Others 2.5 6.6 3
Booster Gold 3.5 7.9 3
Catwoman 5.0
The Flash 2 6.5 6
Harley Quinn 7.6 9
Justice League Dark 5.9
Red Lanterns 9.3 6
Sinestro 7.3
Star Spangled 7
Superman 3.5 9.0 8
I've been...well, very inactive lately. I noticed that Newsarama had two reviews for Grayson. http://www.newsarama.com/22070-best-shots-comic-reviews-superior-foes-15-grayson-futures-end-1-more.html This one has a better reception, and mocks the first review heavily. Would it make sense to use both, or just one? || Tako (bother me) || 06:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think since Grayson was so polarizing (I loved the issue. Thought it was once of the most well written comics I have read), I think including both would be fine in this case. (And we got three reviews for it, so it would have been one I would have added to a reception section). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]