Talk:The Moss

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire Low‑importance

The article on The Moss is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article has an infobox

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Bowman Brook and Robin Brook (river) into this article[edit]

I think that Bowman Brook and Robin Brook (river) are part of the Moss Valley. Both articles are unsourced and I think that neither are likely to meet the general notability guidelines on their own. The information in both articles could easily be integrated into this article.—Jeremy (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I, as one, agree and disagree to this. Agree because the articles are quite small, but Disagree because of the fact they can be expanded with lots of info. Tpxpress (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree because these could be expanded, and if you live in this area you will realise that the Robin and Bowman Valleys are very seperate from the Moss Valley. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George, you've been banned around twenty times on Wikimapia for adding poor, unreferenced and non-notable work. Don't move on to Wikipedia with the same ethics. There is no Bowman Valley, because you live on Bowman drive does not make you an expert on the area, especially after about a hundred reverts and deletion of your WM work. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 20:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth has Wikimapia got to do with Wikipedia?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! The Moss Valley really has nothing to do with the Bowman Brook and Robin Brook (river) Tpxpress (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're not GeorgeGriffiths so I fail to see how your poor literacy skills provide help to resolving this request for merging. Regarding the topic at hand, both the Robin Brook valley and so called Bowman Brook valley are tributary of The Moss valley and thus basin, merging all three articles into the main valley article makes sense considering the lack of notability of either the Robin or the Bowman. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, and I know this is getting off topic, but what is wrong with my literacy? OK, I'm not GeorgeGriffiths but I do know what I'm on about. But sometimes I think that you don't. Rant Over — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpxpress (talk • contribs) 21:33, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. Captain Scarlet, there was no need for that. His literacy is excellent for his age (like mine). That could've been really offensive to him. Luckily, Thomas is a very mature person, and he handled it well. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, It was more than offensive. VERY offensive. But like he said, I didn't show it. I didn't go off in a massive mardy. I just kept it in and nhandled it well. Maybe you can't handle it well though Captain Scarlet. Maybe you just want to upset young, clever, bright editors on Wikipedia Tpxpress (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, as usual, I am 100% with you on that point. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Anyway, the articles have been deleted now, so what difference would it make? They're 'not notable' enough, so why create the new section on it? Tpxpress (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sicklebrook Quarry[edit]

I have removed the sentence "Sicklebrook Quarry in Sicklebrook, near Troway is still open." It is unreferenced, and I can find no information about it whatsoever. If you can find documentary evidence, please feel free to reinstate it. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]