Talk:The Littlest Rebel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Littlest Rebel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: War / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Undue Weight Given to Modern "Racism" Claims Makes This Article Non-POV Neutral[edit]

You just had to do it, didn't you, Wikipedia? I suppose citing contemporary reviews under the "Critical reception" heading wasn't sufficient, because finding a negative contemporary review that supported the "racist" POV agenda was either much too hard, or impossible to find. But then you had to go even further by including TWO modern, negative reviews citing "racism" and "stereotypes" in order to give them undue weight against the ONE positive, contemporary review which no doubt more fairly represents the consensus of the public's reception (both black and white) at the time this film was originally released. Well... So much for your claim that Wikipedia articles must adhere to the principle of a "Neutral Point of View". Shameful. Absolutely shameful. 68.228.136.13 (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racism cannot and should not be classed as being ‘non-POV neutral’[edit]

Classing racism as ‘non-POV neutral’ is a racist act 2A00:23C7:F19C:1A01:F4AB:7A96:E190:74BB (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 18:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]