Talk:The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contact info of the Editor-In-Chief is not entirely traceable....[edit]

http://pubs.acs.org/page/jpcbfk/editors.html

http://directory.northwestern.edu/index.cgi?pq=George+C.+Schatz&query=handle%3D52616e646f6d4956a96abf0bcb00932c5ba50bca480211fdb87b081c3501f0ee5b76a6cd71a6475deb99e22310c04bd1&more=1&a=0 --222.64.209.227 (talk) 01:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what the problem is. He is clearly the editor and he is clearly at North Western. --Bduke (Discussion) 02:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment at Talk:Plant Physiology (journal)#Just beare in mind that....--222.64.23.236 (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I still have no idea what you are trying to say. What is the problem? Are you disputing that George C. Schatz is the editor? The link works. It shows he was appointed editor. What clarification is needed? It seems fine to me. Can you give me a good reason why I should not remove the "clarification needed" template? --Bduke (Discussion) 02:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has been visiting a large number of science journal articles and adding clarification templates for no good reason that I can see. He uses dynamic IP addresses that originate with 163data.com.cn. His premise seems to be that every single fact in the article has to have a direct reference - for example, it's not good enough simply to give a journal's website, you have to state exactly where on that site the name of the editor can be found. I revert him whenever I have the energy. andy (talk) 10:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]