Talk:The Dublin City Rounders

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

As per tag and edit summ notes, I wonder whether additional detail is needed. I'm not sure WP:MUSIC is yet covered. WP:SIGCOV on its own should be enough. In honesty I wonder whether (what might appear to some to be) "passing mentions" in the Indo and IT strictly would strictly meet SIGCOV guidelines. It seems to me that the subject is just starting out, and so SIGCOV issues might be considered subjectively. However, only if other relevant criteria were covered (Namely: awards or noms, chart position, radio play, etc.) While the latter appears to be asserted, it seems a little questionable to me. (No judgement, just trying to understand, but my read is that we're saying that Sunshine radio and FM104 are national stations. On the former, I'm not sure which one we are talking about. On the latter, it is not a national station. Is this just an error? Could we clarify? Frankly it doesn't really matter what the case, but it looks a little off when we seem to imply something that isn't 100%. When some of the simpler statements don't hold-up, it will make the reader (or editor) question other aspects. In addressing these issues, I might point out that WP:COI guidelines exist for a reason, and it might be worth considering those also. Guliolopez (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that some of the issues raised above are resolved (certainly the "uncertainty" on the radio play assertion is fixed). However, as noted, I'm not confident the issues wrt Notality/Music guidelines are fully addressed:
  • I still wonder whether SIGCOV is actually met (to my read, there are a few "passing mentions" in news sources. These don't represent broader reviews or coverage events that would typically be required under SIGCOV guidelines).
  • I also wonder whether the specific "yardsticks" of Notability/Music are met (while there is a suggestion of one record getting some limited airplay, I'm not sure this covers what the guidelines expect. And the other criteria (charting/awards/etc) aren't covered.
I still think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but would welcome other thoughts. (Though I would ask that editors contributing to a discussion on this make note of WP:COI guidelines, and declare any association with the subject that might be relevant). Guliolopez (talk) 12:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Dublin City Rounders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]