Talk:Tea Peter/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't feel this is ready to be listed as a Good Article, based purely on prose and not being broad in its coverage. While prose is sufficient in some parts, there are many contentious sentences and statements, some being:

"It was viewed by 4.94 U.S. viewers", does not make sense. Firstly the reader should be aware the Nielsen ratings apply to United States viewers and the measurement is not clear: 4.94 hundred people, million people, bananas? Done
"on the same night with Desperate Housewives and Celebrity Apprentice" on the same network, or same time on different networks? Done
reopening is fine without a hyphen Done
"however praising on the "cutaways which made", 'on' is not needed Done
One cultural reference in Family Guy? The obvious being the Tea Party, perhaps you can include there why Peter joined in the first place. Done

The article on the whole is too short, there are WP:WEIGHT issues: Reception gets almost twice the coverage of Production and cultural references. Guest stars in the latter heading have been overlinked – already wiklinked in the lead. Done I suggest you address the comments above, perhaps take this to Peer Review Done to iron out certain issues and then feel free to renominate. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.