Talk:Takers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cast name changes[edit]

Anyone know where the changes of Rachel to Lily are coming from? I can't find a source that refers to the character as Lily, although the one we have listed doesn't specify a name for the character at all. Millahnna (talk) 00:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Beware!![edit]

It is gross to think that people eat people at ordinary times like on pac-man. Some restaurants open up major changes in the waitress dialog to see or coffined the major crossroad that delivers the customer the punch it deserves. Like drink for example come in many flavors. Do I have any takers...like what kind of music do aught listen to? I hope you Crotm proc. can handle my changes. 2 sentences in the movie deliver what people act like when and where they play "their" video-games at houses; also in gov. district changlog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1301:8B3A:1D50:B054:83CB:B4F3 (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Little girl?[edit]

The plot description refers to Welles as "the same cop, who was with the little girl", something that hasn't been mentioned at all previously in the text. Cleanup and/or clarification, please? 31.209.55.244 (talk) 03:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film Futures[edit]

Takers has a singular distinction in film and financial history!

In June 2010, the CFTC approved first-of-their-kind futures contracts backed by the box office receipts of Takers. However, after intensive lobbying, "the MPAA, supported by the Hollywood talent guilds and other moviemakers (but not Lionsgate), succeeded in inserting an amendment" to the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which added a clause to the Onion Futures Act to forbid box office futures before Takers was released.

Is this worth adding a section? I don't know if I can make the case that this is interesting but I'll stand by it being unusual BenViagas (talk) 23:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]