Talk:Tail (song)

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

restore[edit]

I have restored this from redirect. This is the debut single release from one of the most commercially and critically successful Australian bands of all time. While the song itself wasn't a commercial success, there was sufficient information which is informative and noteworthy, while also being too off-topic for the album article. --rm 'w a vu 03:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NSONG you have to do better than that and establish significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate independent notability. I will restored the redirect. Polyamorph (talk) 09:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the above thread refers to the Powderfinger song of the same name, which is no longer the subject of this article. Richard3120 (talk) 14:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

We don't need two articles for the song, vs song + what outside Korea is the B-side. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In ictu oculi, I'm all for the merge. Will add a mergeto template to the article about the single. Pichpich (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]