This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
@Mr. Guye: What additional information about this Unicode block is required for it to no longer be considered a stub? DRMcCreedy (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmccreedy: I wasn't so much assessing the article as a stub as I was specifying the stub category template to be used. There already was a stub template when I got to the article. It was in the article literally from the beginning. You can remove it if you want, I guess. —Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies @Mr. Guye: the original stub template should have been removed when I added the history section. DRMcCreedy (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Guye: added the third party template to this article, which covers a computer encoding standard defined by the Unicode Consortium and the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 subcommittee. Any independent, third-party sources would have to refer to the Unicode Standard itself and any deviation would, by definition, be non-compliant. What additional sources would fulfill your request for ones not too closely associated with the subject? DRMcCreedy (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]