Talk:THINK C

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origins of Symantech C++[edit]

The Digital Mars article puts the history as

Zortech C++ --> Symantec C++

but this article puts it as

Think C --> Symantec C++


Which is correct?

16:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.61.165 (talk)

Both. The first one for DOS/Windows, the second one for Mac. 1111mol (talk) 22:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Also, MacTech article linked implies that general timeline was 3.0 release as Lightspeed C, purchase by Symantec happens, and 4.0 released as THINK C. This is in contradiction to the first paragraph's timeline. dB (talk) 17:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]