This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Why should Lycon father of Autolycus not be "confused" with Lycon Socrates' accusser? Seeing as how nothing is known about Lycon, it seems silly to automatically assume the two Lycon's are not one and the same
Furius
Why is the assumption that he is the same any less silly? Is there any particular reason to assume that they are the same besides the fact that they share the same name? Since we don't know anything about Lycon Socrates' accuser, and since we do know that distinct people can have the same name, isn't it more prudent to assume that these two are distinct until proven otherwise?Isokrates 02:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've attempted to resolve this issue by adding some actual sources! There is actually a controversy over this matter among scholars. The article now reflects this. Isokrates (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On the Xenophon Wiki page, it is stated that most scholars believe Xenophon to have been born around 431 BCE. This article on his Symposium states that it was probably written in 421 BCE, which would have Xenophon writing the Symposium when he was only 10-years old. The two items need to be reconciled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspirin99 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
