Talk:Supply depot

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Merge from Ammunition dump[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To 'merge Ammunition dump into Supply depot. Klbrain (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both are very weak articles. Supply depot seems like a higher-level concept, but is in even weaker shape them ammo dump. Merging those for now would allow us to improve one article; if it grows to the point ammo dumps need to be split up, we can do it then. For now I suggest a merge. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the article states, supply depots are for categories other than ammunition, which requires special precautions and handling. Agree that both articles are very poor. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse merge. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge; the problem of merging a broad topic to a narrow one is worse than the problem of leaving two poorly-referenced articles where they are. Hence, improve rather than merge. Klbrain (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: They are technically the same thing. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 13:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy go with the majority and remove my objection. Klbrain (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]