Talk:Summoned (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 24 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Disambiguation page was created at the original title. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 23:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


SummonedSummoned (film) – I doubt that the film is the primary topic over either the magical or legal meanings in the hatnote. I would move this and disambiguate the title between the three. BD2412 T 05:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose as unnecessary WP:OVERPRECISION. There is no other article on WP that would reasonably use the title. This article gets only a handful of views per day, so the hatnote is more than sufficient for the tiny number of readers who might want something other than the film. A dab page would be no more useful than the hatnote, while just inconveniencing those who do want the film that's actually titled Summoned. Station1 (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. The other uses are valid redirects and the film is not primary over those common meanings, so we need a dab page. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination and Mdewman6. The one-sentence stub delineating the made-for-TV film should indeed share the proposed Summoned dab page with Summons, Evocation and (under "See also") the Summoning (disambiguation) page. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 23:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support making this a disambiguation page -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Absolutely. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.