Talk:Strategic bankruptcy
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Comment[edit]
I have no idea why this article was a Judaism stub so I removed it. Eddyboguslavsky (talk) 00:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Nominating this article for deletion[edit]
This seems like an article on a topic that exists only in newspapermen's imagination. For example, the idea that Kmart was an otherwise sound company except for its leases at the time of declaring bankruptcy is ridiculous. Even if Kmart was profitable, which it wasnt, for the purposes of financial analysis an underwater lease constitutes a true liability (technically called Capital Lease Obligations and recorded in liabilities on the balance sheet), so it CAN in fact make a company truly insolvent. I am nominating this article for deletion. Kotika98 (talk) 14:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)