Talk:Strömberg (company)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Strömberg (company). Adding the accent is not controversial, but there is no consensus to remove the parenthesized disambiguator 'company'. The article is mostly about the historical Strömberg company that existed from 1889 to 1987 so there is not much incentive to rename it in deference to its current status as a division of another one. If we wanted the most current name then ABB Strömberg would be an option. EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stromberg (company) → Strömberg – The correct spelling for the company name is Strömberg. Gwafton (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move instead to ~~Strömberg (company)~~, Strömberg should probably be retargeted to Strömberg (surname), or have the surname move over the Strömberg redirect. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Move to ABB Strömberg as 65.94.171.126In ictu oculi (talk) 04:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Strömberg should be repointed to Stromberg (disambiguation), per Strömberg (surname). The article states the company name as ABB Oy, part of the "ABB Group". While "Oy" isn't the ideal disambiguator, it does indicate country. There is also ABB Strömberg that is indicative of history and corporate links -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, name ABB Strömberg was in use only for a short period. The article does not tell very much about the current Finnish branch of ABB, it is focussed on Strömberg history. If Strömberg is not a suitable name for the article, what about Strömberg (company), as user In ictu oculi suggested at the beginning? I agree that Oy is not a good disambiguator. --Gwafton (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the move as proposed per 65.94.171.126 but support a move if agreed to by others. — AjaxSmack 14:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.