A fact from Stephen D. Dillaye appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
@Namiba: I'm not sure what uncited opinion you're talking about. It is cited, isn't it? --Coemgenus (talk) 00:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That the campaign was considered unsuccessful is an opinion. 3.3% for a third party candidate nationwide is generally considered a pretty successful campaign.--TM 00:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, OK. I was confused. All I meant by "unsuccessful" was that they didn't win, and in fact did worse than Weaver thought they would. As to uncited, I don't know exactly what Lause wrote, but I could look it up, I suppose. --Coemgenus (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
