Talk:South-west Corner Marine Park

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal South-west Corner Marine Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Australia South West

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Australia South West, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the South West on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Western Australia South WestWikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia South WestTemplate:WikiProject Western Australia South WestWestern Australia South West articles

Content of at least one revision of the associated article was derived in whole or part from non-free copyrighted material on the website http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/marine/marine-reserves/south-west/sw-corner. This material was (prior to placement or subsequently) freely licensed in a manner compatible for Wikipedia's use by the posting of one or more compatible copyright licenses on the external website. Though the release notice for the material, which is irrevocable, may have been later removed from view, or the URL may have changed or gone dead, an archive of that webpage, including the copyright release notice, is available at http://web.archive.org/web/20131214042346/http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/marine/marine-reserves/south-west/sw-corner
For further information, see the Department of the Environment's copyright policy: http://www.environment.gov.au/node/12996 (archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20131102211052/http://www.environment.gov.au/node/12996 ).

Name of the "reserve", and thus the article[edit]

The cited web page [1] does not mention "South-west Corner Commonwealth Marine Reserve". Searching from that page for South-west Corner Commonwealth Marine Reserve (no quotes) finds this list which includes "South-west Corner Marine National Park Zone II", but that's as close as I get. Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place. In the interests of ~~pedantry~~ accuracy, it would be helpful if either:

we had a reference that listed the name of the reserve as used by the article, or
the article title and lead sentence matched the name of something in a ref,

whichever is appropriate. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, no need to change the article title - Evad37 [talk] 04:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/marine/marine-reserves/south-west/sw-corner be a better (more specific) ref - for the lead sentence - than http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/marine/marine-reserves/south-west ? Mitch Ames (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good question, (1) if it remains the stand alone article about a single reserve that is a component of the larger range of 12 reserves - then the second is better as it alerts to the other reserves, however (2) if all the other component 11 reserves have articles created, then the first would be better. (It will be unlikely that I start 11 stubs before bedtime...) satusuro 14:32, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the more specific link is that it doesn't actually have any information on it's location, and so doesn't verify "lower south west and southern coast of Western Australia". - Evad37 [talk] 15:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good point Evad37. I've added the specific ref, and also mention of the network (keeping the network ref).