This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
A fact from Soldiers and Sailors Monument (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,442 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I'll suggest deleting the final picture since it's too similar to the one in the info box. If possible replace it with pictures of the 4 statues. Smallbones (talk) 18:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The title of this monument should clearly be punctuated as Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument - but the inscription on the monument itself is incorrect, omitting the apostrophes (see picture at HMdb.org), so for now I have restrained all my instincts to amend the article... One can argue, though, that an encyclopedia of quality should nevertheless use the correct punctuation. Any views? PANDA(PersonAmendingNumerousDefectiveApostrophes) (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
