Talk:Softs (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 12 May 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SoftsSofts (album) – Softs should either redirect to Soft commodity or to the Soft dab page. "Softs are" refers to Softs, it doesn't refer to a 1976 album. --Relisted. Kharkiv07 (T) 14:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC) In ictu oculi (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Repoint current title to the disambiguation page -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per nom. Really, did you expect any results for an album title when you use the verb "are" after it? In the meantime, I see no immediate justification for a lack of primary topic. Red Slash 22:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid Oppose - "Softs" also refers to Softs. i.e. book results for "Softs is" "Softs are" "Softs can" "Softs" all refer to softs, what else would they refer to? User:Red Slash please present any kind of search from Google Books to make a case that this album is the absolute majority topic for "Softs". It isn't, and you cannot dismiss a Google Book search by misunderstanding how to search for usage. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.