Talk:Society of Saint Pius V
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Society of Saint Pius V article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
Why are we interested in the psychology of the splits?[edit]
Is Fr Cekada speaking as a spokesperson of the SPV? If so, it could be stated. if not, why is it here? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
sedevacantist?[edit]
the first line says "sedevacantist" but 2 sentences later says that the question of sedevacantism is "unresolved"--142.163.195.197 (talk) 01:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
- The SSPV has stated that it lacks the authority to rule on sedevacantism, but considers it a valid theological opinion. Many of its clergy adhere to sedevacantism. Count Cherokee (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)