Talk:Singapore Flyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two almost identical photos?[edit]

Does this article really need two almost identical photos (Image:SingaporeFlyerNDP 2007Preview.JPG and Image:Singapore Flyer NDP2007.JPG? And do the originals have to be that big (1.42MB and 1.28MB)? Michael Bednarek 07:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Is it the biggest of its kind in the world? I always thought the london eye was taller. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MatchStickEleven (talkcontribs) 14:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Yes it's bigger than the London Eye...it's deceptive because of the terminal building with surrounds the base but the top cabins at 165metres from the ground - more than 30metres taller than the structure in London.[reply]

Two Different structures?[edit]

The first image in the article has about 28 capsules while in the second image in the article has about only 8 capsules?

Second image -- probably before the flyer was completed. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Singapore Flyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]