Talk:Simona Halep/GA1

GA Review[edit]

PASSING GA

Article is of pretty high quality. Would need some slight touches to prose, and a full look at sourcing if it were to be submitted for FA, but passed GA criteria.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 17:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures[edit]

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria - ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It contains copyright infringements - ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.- ✓ Pass Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

There are two links in the infobox, per WP:INFOBOXCITE could these be in prose? The one about the age is particularly bad as there are already cites about the age in prose. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved the "turned pro" one to the prose. The one for the age is really just for the whole infobox. There's no obvious place to put it. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Refs look good Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a lot of External links, the iMDB profile seems like a lot. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

. In total, she has been No. 1 for 64 weeks - could we link the whole of "No. 1 for 64 weeks"? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ref in lede should be moved to prose. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, lede is very good. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Main prose[edit]

Should probably mention Constanța is in Romania. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Halep is a former world No. 1 junior.^{[citation needed]} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Junior section comments on "grade", should probably be explained. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Added note. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
First mention of "Grand Slam" should be linked. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Linked first mentions in junior section and pro section. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
career playing low-level $10K ITF Women's Circuit events in Romania in 2006 and 2007. - was the $10k part of the event title? Prize money seems like a weird thing for prose in this way. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sort of. The $10K is the event tier. The WTA does use 125K as an official tier name for their $125,000 tournaments. The tiers with lower prize money don't have an official name, but they are still typically referred to by the prize money. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
she defeated No. 96 - presumably world number 96? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Added an "abbr" to the first instance (this instance) Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There's a lot of this in the article, I'm not sure no. # is a suitible alternative for what we are discussing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- For tennis, it is standard practice to write "world number (ranking)" as "world No. (ranking)" or just "No. (ranking)", both on Wikipedia and in the press. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2013: Breakthrough, six WTA titles, world No. 11 - even if we kept this, we are in sentence case No should be lower case. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- In this format, "No." is always capitalized. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Could we get some alt text for the images. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Added. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"With these two runner-ups, Halep moved up to No. 3" - MOS:NUM says we should use the word "three" instead of 3, etc. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- With this format, the number is never written out. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
, they only won one tie.[140][141][142][143] - beware of WP:REFBOMB, maybe remove a ref or two. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I moved three of these to the middle of the sentence so the usage is more clear. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Halep has described herself as an aggressive baseliner. - perhaps explain what a baseliner is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Added a link to the appropriate page. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of the article looks very good, and well made/sourced. I will have to find out what the deal is with articles under pending changes reviews, as I've never come across one before. Placing on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Lee Vilenski! I addressed everything above. The "world No. X" is a standard tennis format for writing out "world number xxxx". The pending changes thing is just a type of page protection (from many years ago; we probably don't need it any more). Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just suggest either a note or a bracket commenting what No. # means. It should also be "no" in lowercase. Other than that, we're good to go. I have requested the removal of pending changes as it doesn't suit the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added a note in this format: "No." where it says "No. 96 Angelique Kerber". I could add a few more of these, but I don't want to do it everywhere. The capitalization is correct (see for instance this article or virtually any other tennis article). Thanks for removing the protection. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 06:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. In that case, all seems fine for passing. Good job. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes & References[edit]

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments[edit]

Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definately not manditory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.