Talk:Silk Road/Archives/2017

Philosophy 115

It is interesting to see anonymity play two very different roles in Yik Yak and the Silk Road. Anonymity in Yik Yak is used as a tool to generate comfort and safety, while it is used in the Silk Road for potentially malicious and dangerous reasons. The article itself was neutral, as It explained the history behind the name, its operations and how transactions were used with bitcoins and hedging to ensure that bitcoin values were to remain constant. Many of the sources were from credible sources like the New York Times and The Daily Telegraph, and were drawn from information directly from the trial of Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the silk road. These sources tended to stay objective and drew upon evidence and testimonies from the trial itself. One thing that I feel like the article could potentially improve upon is the fact that they only briefly mentions that Ulbricht could have been framed. Ulbricht admitted to creating the Silk Road but transferred control to Mark Karpeles. This could make the article biased since we are not given any evidence, if there were any, that this was actually true. Instead, it puts all of the blame on Ulbricht. This view that Ulbricht was setup as the fall guy is underrepresented in this article. The talk page consists of fixing technical errors that occurred, such as the revenues, his delayed sentencing, and how there have been successors to the silk road, mainly new versions of it like silk road 2 and 3. I would rate this article a B to a C again since everything was properly cited from credible sources, and relatively informative. However, they do lack the important part that Ulbricht may have been framed. -Ashiu33 (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Korea additions

The emphasis on Korea and Japan in the lead paragraph is undue, suggesting that China was a mere station on the way to Korea. Rather, these were off shoots like others covered. The references added support this view. The previous language, "from China to the Mediterranean," is more appropriate for the lead paragraph summary. I am reverting to the prior language and moving the unesco and Japan references to the third paragraph. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.boi.gov.pk/InfoCenter/CPEC.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 10:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Silk Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://altaica.narod.ru/LIBRARY/xronol_tu.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427172440/http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1741-7007-8-15.pdf to http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1741-7007-8-15.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ess.uci.edu/~oliver/silk.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)