Talk:Screen goo

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

To-do list[edit]

Notable because: a prominent product (if not the most prominent) for coating self-made projection screens at this moment, summer 2006

Note to myself: I have to supply links and evidence on this part quite fast, if I want to keep this stub ;)

manufacturer: I am not starting a separate article on this. Maybe a few words on it in the product article
marketing points: It claims to offer good image quality for low cost (well, doesn't all projection screen ads say just that)
product details: advertised as thick acrylic paint with little filler.
other: "Base coat" and a "Top coat" are needed to make a complete projection screen coating.
critique: on many forums, DIY enthusiasts complain on the "banding" of the paint when applied to a surface, leaving visible stripes on the finished screen.
anti-critique: the official saying and the reports of many consumers tell that the effect of "banding" tends to lessen with about 3-4 weeks time
anti-anti-critique: some reports tell that the stripes don't always disappear with time, as advertised.
performance: many reviews can be summed up to form this section of the article.

Well that's about it.. Now I have to find time to turn this to-do list into great prose and a wonderful (stub) article. Santtus 14:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and one thing. As a seasoned wikipedian I'm afraid that the article might be in risk to be speedily deleted - in such a case, please have the courtesy to move this talk page section to my personal talk page, so I can work later to improve the content. Thank you. Santtus 14:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm prominence[edit]

I've looked around and I'll confirm that this seems to be the most prominent product in this space. I could only find two others: DIY theatre, and Project X Paint --Risacher 18:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]