Talk:Sarcoscypha dudleyi
 | Sarcoscypha dudleyi has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 5, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Sarcoscypha dudleyi was named after the botanist William Russell Dudley? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sarcoscypha dudleyi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- What is the current name for Peziza inaequalis?
- Hasn't changed. Sasata (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Then why isn't it linked? Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
What is an issue zero (ref. 14)?
- Removed issue#
Why is the imperfect form listed as a synonym?
From a brief check, the article appears to be comprehensive. You haven't cited the paper on spore ontogeny that I remember looking at for some other Sarcoscypha, but I suppose it's a little esoteric. Ucucha 18:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I am now passing GA, with one small point left. Ucucha 22:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)