Talk:Sarah Blasko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed major edits[edit]

Over the next few days (week?), I intend to make several major edits. Interims edits may appear to be disorganised or incomplete. I will start with the Lead (woefully inadequate at a single sentence) and infobox and then work my way through (returning to the Lead as necessary).shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 20:37, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest mapping your edits out so you can do them in a relatively quick sequence—within the span of an hour or two rather than over two or three days. Don't forget that you can tag the article with {{inuse}} while you're making the edits. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestions but I'll plod along in my usual sedentary manner, if any of my interim edits annoy you (or anyone else) then edit them at will—if I object I'll say so here. By the way, I've done a basic once-through of this article but still haven't finished my process.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 01:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enough reliable refs?[edit]

Are there enough reliable sources for the 'plate to be removed? I believe I've covered the previously identified contentious claims and verified them with reliable sources. Current refs 15 & 16 are from Blasko's website and need wikifying (I'll see if independent sources verify these minor points). If there are no objections I'll remove the 'plate after I've finished my proposed major edits.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 04:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done my bit. All the national airplay chart positions still require citations: I've left a note there. Further points that require RS may remain but I think the main unsupported facts previously identified have been verified, modified or deleted. I have consequently deleted the 'plate for references needed. If more disputed information is identified/returned the 'plate may have to be re-inserted.shaidar cuebiyar ( talk | contribs ) 20:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't SLK appear in the associated acts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.178.24 (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seeker Lover Keeper material removed from discography[edit]

Aside from updating the article since my last major edits, I've removed the Seeker Lover Keeper material from the Sarah Blasko discography section: it belongs in the SLK article's discography, not here. While Blasko was a member of SLK, and this is mentioned in the main text, the discography should list her solo material.

I'm not entirely happy with the Touring sectn but I will leave this for other interested editors: I'm moving on.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sarah Blasko. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]