Talk:Sally Ann Howes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Assessment

It needs better cites, and some encyclopedic language, but it's thorough enough to be a B.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit/cleanup?[edit]

This article is too long and needs to be extensively pared down. It also makes extensive use of HTML instead of standard wiki formatting. It also has no listed sources, which leads me to suspect that either the author is the world's hugest fan, or (more likely) a lot of this was lifted from another source. Unfortunately I am no expert on Ms. Howes. Anybody want to brutally start machete-ing this down to a manageable size? Canonblack 03:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article was not lifted from other sources but has been carefully composed for the last 20 months or so with what little research material is available. I don't update IMDB too often because it takes so long and isn't by nature as accurate - and I am the source of the information there too. This is more flexible. It is the most comprehensive information on Ms. Howes, and at the most it gets tweaked anymore as I haven't found any new substantial information in a long time, not even new credits. World's biggest fan? I don't know. But I do know there used to be nothing on her in Wikipedia before I started working on her information, and now it has real information. Also, not everyone is as schooled in the art of Wikifying articles, myself included. So have a little patience. jennyarata 03:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If I can find a Wiki article with footnotes, I can look at the editing and see how someone else did it, and then I would be glad to list my sources. jennyarata 17:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ccbb-beach.jpg[edit]

Image:Ccbb-beach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nn2.jpeg[edit]

Image:Nn2.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sally Ann Howes/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Biography assessment rating comment ==

WikiProject Biography Assessment

It needs better cites, and some encyclopedic language, but it's thorough enough to be a B.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sally Ann Howes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]