Talk:Sailor Moon (1994 TV pilot)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by ReaderofthePack (talk). Self-nominated at 23:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything checks out here. Personally I'd go for ALT1; the fact that there was a second attempt isn't as well-known and would certainly be interesting. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm fine with the second alt being chosen - I kind of think that the first one is a little clunky in comparison, honestly. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 11:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

The title goes against WP:CONCISE. "North American" only makes sense if any non-US North American country is involved (which is not). There are no animation adaptations to distinguish it from. Sailor Moon (1994 TV pilot) goes to the point as per the articles listed at Category:Unaired television pilots (CC) Tbhotch 03:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced the fair use image[edit]

A well-meaning editor replaced the fair use version I uploaded with a larger resolution that they added to Wikimedia Commons. I've reinstated the version I uploaded. The reason is that the pilot is still held under a restrictive copyright so non-free fair use rules apply here. It must be tagged with the proper rationales and it can only be of a certain resolution/size. I did consider that the other version has the YouTuber's channel name watermarked onto it, but I don't know that it's really necessary to have it on the image. It can illustrate that the YouTuber discovered it and uploaded it to their channel (with permission), but that's something that can be done with words alone in the article. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 14:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]