Talk:Sacco and Vanzetti/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Disgrace
Dukakis on the unlawful sentence of death passed on Sacco and Vanzetti: "any disgrace should be forever removed from their names". But what about the disgrace perpetrated by the US government of the time on these two men ? Pamour (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- What about the deaths of Berardelli and Parmenter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.39.71.98 (talk) 10:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Far from clear
It is not clear if anyone was killed in the earlier attempted robbery in Bridgewater in 1919. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- This attempted robbery was on 24/12/1919. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- See http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/sacvan.html This says that no one was hurt in the attempted robbery in Bridgewater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- All shot-gun shells can kill a man. If the jury tampered with a shell, this would not normally cause anyone to be acquitted or a mis-trial to be declared. The whole passage is close to being idiotic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 10:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- See http://www.famous-trials.com/saccovanzetti/770-chronology . This says "no one is hurt". This is in the attempted robbery in Bridgewater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 10:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- The alleged sources, Watson and Joughin, need careful study. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 11:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- See http://www.famous-trials.com/saccovanzetti/770-chronology . This says "no one is hurt". This is in the attempted robbery in Bridgewater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 10:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- All shot-gun shells can kill a man. If the jury tampered with a shell, this would not normally cause anyone to be acquitted or a mis-trial to be declared. The whole passage is close to being idiotic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 10:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- See http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/sacvan.html This says that no one was hurt in the attempted robbery in Bridgewater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.127.25 (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)