Talk:STX (sports manufacturer)

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lacrosse Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lacrosse, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of lacrosse on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LacrosseWikipedia:WikiProject LacrosseTemplate:WikiProject Lacrosselacrosse articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To Osbus[edit]

I added the infobox but I could not find some information and we still need the logo.--Yarnalgo 01:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, nice job. It's hard finding a logo due to all that license and copyrighting crap one has to deal with. I'm working on it...--Osbus 02:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, I got the image. --Osbus 22:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --Yarnalgo 22:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

STX[edit]

What about the ASCII character STX? It is 2 in Hex and in ASCII.70.70.146.32 (talk) 17:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's the main STX???[edit]

How come looking up "STX" brings to the page of this relatively minor company instead of the giant korean company of the same name which is probably 100 times bigger? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.37.41.63 (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STX Lacrosse Logo[edit]

I would like to propose an update to the file shown for STX's brand logo. The current logo shown on the page is the brand's wordmark (black text reading STX). The file is low resolution and includes a white background. I have a hi-res, transparent background version of the file in SVG that could be used to replace it.

With that said, the wordmark is not the primary logo for STX; the brand predominantly uses a version of the logo with white text on a red background. I have an SVG file for this logo option, if that is preferred. Do any more tenured Wikipedia admins have advice and/or direction around which format is preferred? WalthamWatchman (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]