Talk:Round and Round (Ratt song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Metal Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Untitled[edit]

The sarcastic philosophical discourse that compares them to Neo Hegelians (although humorous) is completely unwarranted given the nature of the project.

"The song serves as a definitive manifesto for the idealogical trajectory of the band. It's shamleless embrace of Absolute Idealism offers a striking juxtaposition to the popular worldviews of the day, including nihilism, existentialism, and social relativism. However, Ratt cannot be neatly catogorized as simple Neo Hegelians. Their work is rooted in Antiphon's rhetoric much more than Platonic discourse. Even then, Ratt also offered a new take on philosophy that can be ascribed to no one but Ratt, making them true originals." - Are you fucking kidding me? --68.48.204.113 06:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really that puzzling that she turns into a rat, them being Ratt? -Syberghost (talk) 21:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Roundround.jpg[edit]

Image:Roundround.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]