Talk:Roughtail stingray/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Signing up for this review, comments later.

Once again, the article is already very good. A few comments: Sasata (talk) 02:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

• "…and in the northwestern Atlantic, where it is not utilized." add "commercially"?

Done

• the prologue appears to be available on Google books

Prologue of what?

Sorry, I meant the protologue :)

Ref+link added

• link disjunct

Done

• "densely encrustated" is this spelling intentional or should it be encrusted?

Fixed

• define/link sinuous

Linked to Wiktionary

• "Polypocephalus sp." singular (sp.) or plural (spp.)?

Singular, as I believe it's undescribed

• link demersal

Done

• "Anecdotal reports suggest that landings of this species are decreasing" What does "landings" mean?

Linked to Fisheries glossary

• dab papilla

Added definition and unlinked, since there's no good article for this anyway

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This article meets all the GA criteria: Sasata (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Well written, complies with MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):

   Well-cited to reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Similar to other stingray GAs.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Six images, all PD or with free-use licenses.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 05:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)