Talk:Romancecar

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Trains in Japan.

Japan: Trains Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:51, May 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Trains in Japan descendant WikiProject.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

About Odakyu 50000 VSE Photo[edit]

Which photograph do you feel more beautiful?
I recommend a left photograph.
A right photograph has complicated scenery other than a train.
Moreover, when this train is seen from width, it looks the most beautiful.

STRONGlk7 (talk) 00:58, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that "beauty" is the prime criterion here, and it will be very subjective anyway. For reference, the following images are available at Wikipedia Commons, including the image that was used in the article since March 2013. In my opinion, all of these images are of higher quality and are more appropriate as the top image for the article than the older (March 2005), relatively low-resolution (1,152 x 720 pixels, 127 KB) and over-exposed image that has recently been added to both this and the Odakyu 50000 series VSE article. --DAJF (talk) 05:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1,280 x 960 pixels, March 2013
4,288 x 2,848 pixels, May 2010
1,600 x 1,200 pixels, February 2012
3,593 x 2,300 pixels, December 2011