Talk:Rock On 2

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Rock On!!#Sequel .

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Title Correction[edit]

The official title seems to be "Rock On 2", without the exclamation marks, as apparent from official souces including youtube channel and twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedBookCamel (talk • contribs) 14:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to Bollywood Hungama, you stand corrected, my friend. Best, Nairspecht (talk) (work) 06:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see the official fb page https://facebook.com/RockOn2TheFilm/, twitter https://twitter.com/RockOn2TheFilm, youtube https://youtube.com/watch?v=moDxQHoGNUQ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xl6FhsnxBcE, itunes https://itunes.apple.com/in/album/rock-on-2-original-motion/id1155516987 and it is also apparent from the poster that there are no exclamation marks!!RedBookCamel (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Moving page now! Best, Nairspecht (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Taniya94 seems to like roman II in the title, which has no mention in any media..till the official censor certificate comes out, can this page be moved back to Rock On 2 ?RedBookCamel (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a hand, showing two straight fingers in the official logo. Nowhere in the poster shows the digit "2" to define the sequel. Roman "II" is visually more similar to the straight fingers shown in the logo.Taniya94 (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The official verified sources I've listed above all use "2" to represent the title. Like I said, till the official censor board certificate comes out, please move the page back to "Rock On 2" — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedBookCamel (talk • contribs) 03:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office Speculations[edit]

So this has become an issue. My opinion is that the speculations are baseless, arbitrarily made by newspapers without any data. TheGoodLion compares it with Prometheus (2012 film) and opines that the content should stay. Please discuss. Jean Stair (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not useless. I'm sorry but u haven't read more publications and sites, Box office projections have been done for decades. Major Hollywood prints like The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, Deadline.com and Box Office Mojo has this as a trend now and there's no harm to it. In the West (Hollywood), studio executives give their own projections which a relatively more conservative than industry forecast – that is why to range is there and not a solid number. These are projections – a concoction of studio estimates and industry forecast. These are no way just random numbers put forward by random people. They are backed by certain factors as I've written before from IBT. Read more movie articles, especially Hollywood movies as they contain projections before the actual numbers. There's no harm, no rules to say this is illegal in Wiki. User:TheGoodLion —Preceding undated comment added 15:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]